Iron Man's rage proves the need for government scrutiny
Review of the movie Captain America: Civil War
In the case of Captain America: Civil War, I was also hesitant because of the chauvinistic name of that Captain and the theme of a civil war. I thought it would be yet another American self-glorification. But I was wrong about that. Rather than some patriotic parade, it parades the consequences of a chauvinism of another kind: male chauvinism. It's about what men might do when they are out of control.
In the movie, the US and United Nations push for a Hero Registration Act to supervise and limit the activities of superheroes. It is initiated by a lethal tragedy the Avengers are accused of causing, but that is questionable since it happened while they tried to avoid an even bigger tragedy. Still, what happens later in the movie gives several solid reasons for the UN Act.
The Avengers are split into two teams in strong disagreement of the UN Act, and the hostility between them increases. When superheroes get aggressive, albeit towards each others, the whole world is in peril.
The superhero battle centers on the Winter Soldier, a former supervillain struggling to overcome the brainwashing he was the victim of by a militant government. He is wrongly accused of additional mayhem. One group of Avengers believes in his innocence and tries to protect him, the others do not and want him incarcerated. In their agitated state they don't even try to sort things out.
Iron Man is leading the side of the latter, and also sort of a supporter of the UN Act. He believes to follow it by pursuing Winter Soldier. At a climactic scene close to the end of the movie, Iron Man finds out that Winter Soldier, when still under brainwash control by the vicious government forces, was the one who killed his parents. That revelation makes Iron Man completely lose it and with all his power try to kill him, even if it means killing his defender Captain America in the process.
Iron Man's rage is certainly understandable, but not his refusal to listen to explanations and his willingness to be both court and executioner without hesitation. That is a monster. He was lucky not to succeed, but it was not at all thanks to him. And he still committed a bundle of serious criminal offenses in any nation's law.
Most of all, he proved what he had earlier himself agreed on - that there was cause for the UN Act. Superheroes, like any member of society, should not be above the law and not be exempt of the social control all citizens also in democratic societies need to abide by.
The one who protected Winter Soldier from Iron Man's rage, Captain America, actually had the opposing view that the UN Act was a mistake. So, in his actions he proved himself wrong, whereas Iron Man in his failure proved himself right.
That's really a good plot and plot twist, but watching the movie I had the feeling that this was unintentional. The story seemed just sort of happening to form this message.
On the other hand, I have learned through the years never to distrust authors' awareness of every apect of their own stories. In the process of writing, every detail and angle is examined, contemplated, and reexamined. There is rarely something unintentional in a story. So, by this benefit of a doubt I must conclude that this story was unusually intricate and thought provoking for a superhero movie.
February 13, 2021
My Other Websites
Click the header to get to the webpage where I present all my books in English. Click an image below to go to that book's page on Amazon.
I'm a Swedish author of fiction and non-fiction books in both Swedish and English. I'm also an artist, an historian of ideas and a 7 dan Aikikai Shihan aikido instructor. Click the header to read my full bio.